I arrived to the court late. They moved the case more than 20 miles from my home. I was not provided temporary spousal support as mandated by Family Code 4320. The trauma of the hate crimes caused debilitating insomnia. The most important question why was I being sent to Stanley Mosk?What was the purpose of going before judge Lawrence Riff?The court willfully with malice and forethought prohibited me equal protection under the law.
Gibson vs Gibson Transcripts January 7, 2020
Judge Riff begins the hate crimes, and misconduct. Page 3 See line 4. Judge Riff makes multiple false statements. He states that he made orders on October 23, 2019. Which is a lie. What he is doing is retaliating against me for filing a Motion to Disqualify Judge Sarah Heidel. On December 18 there were 2 issues on the calendar. There was a Motion to Disqualify on the calendar therefore Judge Heidel shouldn’t have heard either. Moving back to January 7, 2020 Judge Lawerence false accusation that he made an order on October 23, 2019 was a lie, and perjury. This is a blatant retaliation for December 18, 2019 when I accused Heidel of racial discrimination and filing a motion to disqualify Heidel. On December 18,2019 Heidel during the Motion to deem me Karrie Gibson vexatious, Heidel called a recess after she realized that I knew the name of the Sheriff who tried to circumvent the service to Judge Sarah Heidel of the Motion to Disqualify Judge Sarah Heidel, on Heidel’s behalf. Judge Heidel instructed Bailiff Hill to tell us the hearing was over because she knew that according to CCP 170.1 – Motion to Recuse a Judge in California that everything in the case must halt.
Judge Riff gives false testimony. Stating he made an order on October 19, 2019. Which isn’t true. He only asked me to submit the Declaration of Disclosure. I went to self help to get information about the Declaration of Disclosure. The court surveillance will show me in the self help. Which is in the same room as the court clerk. During this time the self help attorney informed me that opposing filed a Motion to deem me vexatious. Recall Judge Sarah Heidel couched Attorney Carter to file the Motion to deem me vexatious on a September hearing when I wasn’t present.
Moving back to January 7, 2020 I have told the court repeatedly that I was suffering from medical issues. The court continues to accuse me of interrupting him. He wouldn’t allow me to speak. I continued to deny the sequence of events that he is saying. He is trying to set me up and maligned me. I am protesting. Page 4 line 7 thru 9. See image below. The court says orders were made on June 21, 2019. There were no orders made on June 21, 2019 other than she granted the Motion to Compel Interrogatories and Vocational evaluation. Which violated California Civil Procedure. Opposing never made an effort to Meet and Confer regarding discovery. Opposing did not follow California Civil Procedure. I didn’t have an attorney. I continued to request an attorney. Heidel ruled in favor of opposing insinuating I didn’t adhere to orders made in March. There were a Motion For Vocational Evaluation. I filed a Motion To Reconsider for the March 14th Vocational Evaluation. Opposing failed to follow California Family Code 4331 when requesting the Vocational Evaluation. I never received the Interrogatories. Attorney Simon Bahwani instructed me to send a letter explaining I didn’t receive the interrogatories, which I followed his instructions. Before filing a Motion to Compel for discovery the attorney must seek a Meeting to Confer. Through out the Divorce Proceeding Opposing Ariel Carter never complied with Meeting and Confer, I wasn’t represnted so I wasn’t aware of the Meet and Confer requirement. Judge Heidel failed to follow the law. Every hearing they court failed to follow the law.
The court ruled in favor of opposing on June 21, 2019 when opposing failed to send a Meet and Confer letter demanding a response. I didn’t know about the Motion to Compel. The attorney with C.O.R.E failed to inform me. I think C.O.R.E specifically Simon Aziz Budhwani and Charles Major are part of the collusion, fraud and hate crimes against me. Charles Major previously worked with Ariel Carter. I hired C.O.R.E around April of 2019. If they did their due diligence, they would have reviewed the court docket, see there was a Motion to Compel on the court Calendar for June 21, 2019. I’m giving this background to demonstrate Judge Lawrence perjured himself on January 7, 2020. It just hit me that C,O,R,E came back asking that i sign a limited to scope agreement, after talking to opposing Ariel Carter, and see the Motion to Compel. C.O.R.E is in cahoots with opposing.
BREAK DOWN
On January 7, 2020 In the courts testimony Judge Lawrence P Riff states that his tentatively orders are as follows. ** Tentative plans today to do is my tentative plan is to make a finding that the case may proceed to judgement without the respondent serving a Declaration of Disclosure .The 2nd thing i intend to do, I’m tentatively thinking about is Precluding Respondent Ms. Gibson from calling any witnesses at trial other than the parties and precluding her from introducing any exhibits because of the continued non compliance with Heidel orders. Judge Lawrence P Riff testimony and action shows malicious forethought “Men’s Rea” Mens Rea is a Latin term meaning “guilty mind.” In criminal law, it refers to the mental state or culpability that a defendant must possess at the time of committing a prohibited act (known as the actus reus, or “guilty act”) for the conduct to constitute a crime.
Read my testimony on page 7 and 8 of the transcripts from January 7,2020
Judge Riff with malicious forethought deprived me of my right to an attorney under California Family Code 2030. I pointed out that I am black, the opposing is white, that I am being harmed because I am black. He talks about a witness list. I have no idea what he is referring to. He said orders where made on June 21, 2019. On June 21, 2019 the court held a hearing when I did not have an attorney. I requested an evidentiary hearing. In my request for an evidentiary hearing I submitted a witness list. Heidel decline my request for an evidentiary hearing. I have no idea what he is talking about because I am not represented. I was never consulted, He mentions the Motion to Disqualify. He says February 11, 2019 I filed a Motion to Disqualify. His date is inaccurate. On page 10 Judge Riff acknowledged that I filed a Motion to Disqualify for misconduct. He insinuates that I wrote the court date was set for January 13, 2020. How can I write the date or issue a date. A young black women who works in the Stanley Mosk Superior court wrote in the date. I remember her because she had filed another request. Her name was either Ruwanda or Lawanda. ** *****find the document If you look through every transcript the court never gives me the opportunity to discuss what I am asking for. I requested an attorney on Januray 2, 2019 Judge Heidel gaslight me. See page below ***** Screenshot page from transcript
Page 9 of January 7, 2020 transcripts Judge Riff is setting me up, while simultaneously gaslighting me. He asked about a witness list. I have no idea what he is talking about. I didn’t even understand why we were at Stanley Mosk. The court docket said moved to Stanley Mosk due to long trial. I tell him that my husband makes over $180,00 that I am on food stamps. I say my purpose is the shine a light on Judge Sarah Heidel racism. On page 8 I say I need an attorney. According to California Family Code 2030
According to California Family Code (a)(1) In a proceeding for dissolution of marriage, nullity of marriage, or legal separation of the parties, and in any proceeding subsequent to entry of a related judgment, the court shall ensure that each party has access to legal representation, including access early in the proceedings, to preserve each party’s rights by ordering, if necessary based on the income and needs assessments, one party, except a governmental entity, to pay to the other party, or to the other party’s attorney, whatever amount is reasonably necessary for attorney’s fees and for the cost of maintaining or defending the proceeding during the pendency of the proceeding.
I am trying to speak, to explain that I need an attorney. That Heidel did not make any orders in which I didn’t comply. That I need an attorney, and I am concern that he too is bias because my husband is white. I tell him I was in a 23 year abusive marriage. He tells me to stop. He fails to address any of my testimony, that opposing makes $180 annually and I am food stamps. That opposing is an abusive alcoholic. That I feel like he is being bias because I am black and opposing is white. He tells me to stop. I say of course the black woman doesn’t get to speak.
He begins to talk about the Motion to Disqualify. He illegally denies my right to hear the Motion to Disqualify. He is violating California Civil Code by even having a hearing when there is a Motion to Disqualify on the calendar. Riff takes the Motion to Disqualify off the Calendar completely but moves the Motion for attorney fees to Department 2. I explained that when I attempted to file in her court the clerk denied me the right to file..
I gave testimony that the first time I mentioned something about being black he shut me down. He start saying that I filed in the wrong court. I asked him why am I in his court. I don’t have attorney. I have no idea what is going on. Again he implies that he made an order on October 23, 2019 which is a fabrication. He is retaliating against me for Dec 18, 2019 when I called Heidel out for being bias against me for being black. He santioned with me with all these limitations in order to harm me financially. Riff is with malice and forethought causing me irrepariage financial and mental harm. I charge genocide. That this is a cold orchestrated attempted to harm me because I am a black women.
.
***********************************
Declaration of Disclosure
**** MINUTE ORDER
***Evidentiary Sanctions
Under Family Code 2107
****Please take note that the transcripts from January 7, 2025 are compromised. Several lines has inaccurate testimony. The pages and lines numbers of the omitted testimony is on the website. I will include the link to the website in the description box.
Testimony Omitted
- Page 3 Line 16 (The Court)
- Page 3 Line 28 (The Respondent)
- Page 4 Line 24 (The Court)
- Page 5 Line 3.
- Page 5 Line 25
- Page 8 Line 10
- Page 8 Line 26
- Page 9 line 1
- Page 9 line 3
- Page 9 line 6
- Page 9 line 10
- Page 9 line 23
- Page 10 line 3
- Page 10 line 5
- Page 10 line 14
- Page 10 line 15
- Page 10 line 20
- Page10 line 22
- Page 10 line 25
- Page 11 line 2
- Page 11 Line 4
- Page 12 line 20
- Page 12 line 21
- Page 12 line 22
- Page 12 line 28
- Page 13 line 5
- Page 13 line 25
- Page 13 line 26
- Page 13 line 28
- Page 14 line 1
- Page 14 line 9
- Page 15 line 6
- Page 15 line 8
- Page 15 line 19
- Page 15 line 24